# RFC: New Validation Component

**URL:** https://discourse.laminas.dev/t/rfc-new-validation-component/208
**Category:** Contributors
**Tags:** zend-validator
**Created:** [July 19, 2017, 7:10pm UTC](https://discourse.laminas.dev/t/rfc-new-validation-component/208 "2017-07-19T19:10:45Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Slamdunk](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex032/user_avatar/discourse.laminas.dev/slamdunk/32/115_2.png) [@Slamdunk](https://discourse.laminas.dev/u/Slamdunk)
#### Post date: [August 21, 2017, 7:58am UTC](https://discourse.laminas.dev/t/rfc-new-validation-component/208/19 "2017-08-21T07:58:26Z")

</div>

I’m sorry, Am I the only one dazed by the drastic turn in the naming convention that removes `Interface` suffix from the interfaces proposed?

Likely this was discussed and accepted in another RFC or topic and I missed it, if so I would appreciate a link to it.

If not, I feel the need to bring the attention to this point too: could we stick to ZF2 naming convention?

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.laminas.dev/t/rfc-new-validation-component/208)._